Top 10 Tech Trends to Watch in 2025

Accepting Technological Developments for Improved Productivity


In the ever-evolving globe of technology, the year 2025 will unquestionably offer a variety of innovations designed to boost performance and performance. Best Artificial Turf Las Vegas Nevada. As we seek to optimize our possibility in this future landscape, welcoming these technical advances will be vital. This essay intends to discover the relevance of these improvements and supply a roadmap for leveraging them to enhance productivity.


In the last years, we have actually seen a substantial makeover in various fields due to technical innovations. From Expert System (AI) to robotics, blockchain to big data, these improvements have not just shaped our lifestyle but have actually also overhauled conventional organization models. Their capacity to enhance processes, lower human error, and supply exceptional results swiftly and successfully is significant. As we come close to 2025, these technological advancements are anticipated to be a lot more advanced and incorporated right into our everyday routines, assuring boosted performance.


First of all, consider the role of Expert system and Artificial Intelligence. These innovations are already at the leading edge of boosting performance by automating routine jobs and giving informative data analysis. In 2025, we can anticipate AI and ML to be much more advanced, with capabilities to anticipate fads, choose, and execute complicated tasks with marginal human treatment. As a result, accepting these innovations and incorporating them into our job processes will be essential for optimizing efficiency.


Secondly, take into consideration the impact of the Web of Points (IoT).

Top 10 Tech Trends to Watch in 2025 - Artificial Turf Las Vegas Las Vegas home remodel

  1. Artificial Grass Las Vegas custom installations
  2. Artificial Grass Las Vegas for backyards
  3. Artificial Turf Las Vegas installation
  4. Artificial Turf Las Vegas maintenance tips
  5. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas installation
With an ever-increasing number of devices attached to the web, the IoT provides a chance for seamless integration and interaction, causing enhanced effectiveness. By 2025, we can prepare for a more interconnected globe, where the IoT will play a critical role in handling and regulating different facets of our work and personal lives.


Furthermore, developments in cloud computer and digital reality are anticipated to change the way we function.

Top 10 Tech Trends to Watch in 2025 - Artificial Grass Las Vegas wholesale prices

  1. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas commercial applications
  2. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas Las Vegas home remodel
  3. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas bulk supplier
  4. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas drought resistant
  5. Artificial Turf Las Vegas design ideas
With cloud computer, we can anticipate a more collaborative and versatile workplace, as this modern technology allows for real-time sharing and modifying of papers, decreasing time and boosting efficiency. On the other hand, virtual truth can supply immersive training experiences, causing an extra skilled and reliable labor force.


However, embracing these technical technologies is not without its difficulties.

Top 10 Tech Trends to Watch in 2025 - Artificial Grass Las Vegas wholesale prices

  1. Artificial Turf Las Vegas wholesale prices
  2. Artificial Grass Las Vegas maintenance tips
  3. Artificial Grass Las Vegas Las Vegas home remodel
  4. Artificial Turf Las Vegas Las Vegas summer lawns
  5. Artificial Turf Las Vegas eco friendly options
Concerns such as data protection, technological inequality, and the demand for constant knowing and adjustment present significant obstacles. Consequently, while we embrace these technologies, it is important to address these issues proactively to really optimize efficiency.


Finally, the year 2025 will most certainly present a wealth of technological innovations that assure improved efficiency. Welcoming these innovations and integrating them right into our work procedures will certainly be important for taking full advantage of performance

Carrying Out Time Management Techniques in the Future Workplace


As we march quickly towards 2025, the future work environment is set to undertake a considerable change. The evolution of technology, the increase of artificial intelligence, and the shift in the direction of remote and versatile job settings will require a brand-new technique to time monitoring. With the aim of maximizing efficiency, the application of effective time administration techniques will certainly be extra vital than ever.


One of the significant changes we prepare for in the future work environment is the boosted reliance on project monitoring devices. These electronic systems will use a detailed overview of tasks, deadlines, and team application. They will certainly enable us to prioritize tasks, established practical target dates, and assign sources effectively. A well-implemented task administration device will certainly be a cornerstone in attaining maximum performance as it minimizes the time invested in management jobs, enabling people to focus on their core obligations.


An additional significant time administration method that will be prevalent in the future office is the use of expert system (AI). AI can automate regular jobs, decreasing the time spent on them and maximizing time for even more calculated obligations. In addition, AI can provide insights right into work patterns and behaviors, aiding people comprehend where they are losing time and just how they can work more effectively.


The limit between job and personal life is anticipated to obscure further in the future office. Therefore, preserving a healthy and balanced work-life balance will end up being more challenging but also more vital. As a result, time obstructing strategies will certainly acquire popularity. Time blocking entails scheduling particular time ports for different tasks or activities throughout the day. It makes sure that there is a balance in between work and personal life, and that time is designated effectively.


Remote work is another trend that is right here to stay. With this brand-new standard, the typical 9 to 5 day may come to be much less appropriate, and adaptable job hours could end up being a lot more common. This versatility can potentially lead to an "always-on" job society, making it necessary to establish clear boundaries and handle time effectively. Methods such as the Pomodoro strategy, where work is broken down right into intervals generally 25 mins in length, separated by time-outs, can assist manage time a lot more efficiently.


Finally, the future office in 2025 will certainly present brand-new challenges and chances for time administration. The application of innovative tools and methods, coupled with an enhanced focus on work-life equilibrium and versatility, will be vital in making the most of performance. By accepting these changes and adapting to brand-new methods of functioning, we can make certain that we are gotten ready for the future and can prosper in the developing work environment.

Adjusting to the Altering Nature of Work and Company


Making Use Of Expert System and Machine Learning Equipment for Performance


Making Use Of Expert System and Artificial Intelligence Devices for Efficiency in 2025


The future holds enormous opportunities, and 2025 is no exception. Among the crucial aspects to consider is maximizing effectiveness in different spheres of life. This essay will talk about exactly how the usage of Expert system (AI) and Artificial Intelligence (ML) devices can improve productivity and effectiveness in multiple domains by 2025.

Top 10 Tech Trends to Watch in 2025 - Artificial Grass Las Vegas wholesale prices

  1. Artificial Turf Las Vegas for backyards
  2. Artificial Turf Las Vegas Las Vegas home remodel
  3. Artificial Grass Las Vegas wholesale prices
  4. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas eco friendly options
  5. Artificial Grass Las Vegas realistic looking turf


AI and ML are two of the most transformative modern technologies of the 21st century. They have the potential to redefine the way we live, work, and communicate with the globe. In 2025, these innovations will certainly be more mature, extra easily accessible, and much more integrated right into our every day lives, using plenty of chances for efficiency renovations.


In a business circumstance, AI and ML can be leveraged to automate mundane jobs, liberating time for staff members to concentrate on more complex and creative job. For example, AI-powered chatbots can manage consumer questions, while ML formulas can analyze substantial amounts of data to supply workable insights for calculated decision-making. This not just quickens procedures yet additionally lowers the danger of human mistake, thus boosting general performance.


In the area of education, AI and ML devices can offer individualized learning experiences, adjusting to specific students needs in real-time. These formulas can recognize locations where a student is having a hard time and use customized assistance, consequently optimizing discovering effectiveness.


In health care, AI and ML can enhance diagnostics and therapy plans. Using anticipating evaluation, these technologies can assist identify diseases at a beginning, making therapy extra efficient and effective. Furthermore, AI and ML can automate administrative tasks, allowing medical care experts to devote even more time to patient care.


The home front is not neglected in the effectiveness change. Smart homes powered by AI and ML can automate various tasks, from managing temperature and lighting to taking care of safety and security systems and home appliances. This not only boosts comfort but additionally improves energy performance, reducing carbon footprint.


Lastly, in transportation, AI and ML are currently transforming the method we relocate. Self-driving lorries, optimized logistics, predictive maintenance, and web traffic administration are simply a few examples of exactly how these modern technologies can enhance effectiveness and safety.


Nevertheless, it is important to remember that the effective application of AI and ML tools calls for a mindful balance. Moral considerations, privacy worries, and the risk of work displacement must be attended to. Furthermore, the potential benefits of these modern technologies need to come to all, not just a fortunate few.

Top 10 Tech Trends to Watch in 2025 - Artificial Grass Las Vegas realistic looking turf

  1. Artificial Turf Las Vegas for playgrounds
  2. Artificial Turf Las Vegas sports field turf
  3. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas low maintenance lawns
  4. Artificial Turf Las Vegas commercial applications
  5. Synthetic Turf Las Vegas landscaping ideas


Finally, as we approach 2025, AI and ML will unquestionably play a pivotal

Useful links

The Las Las Vega Valley is a major metropolitan area in the southerly part of the U. S. state of Nevada, and the 2nd largest in the Southwestern USA. The state's largest metropolitan heap, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Statistical Area is coextensive since 2003 with Clark Area, Nevada. The Valley is mostly defined by the Las Vegas Valley land development, a 600 sq mi (1,600 km2) container location bordered by hills to the north, south, east and west of the metropolitan area. The Valley is home to the three biggest incorporated cities in Nevada: Las Las Vega, Henderson and North Las Las Vega. Eleven unincorporated communities controlled by the Clark County government become part of the Las Vegas Municipality and make up the biggest community in the state of Nevada. The names Las Vegas and Vegas are interchangeably made use of to show the Valley, the Strip, and the city, and as a brand by the Las Las Vega Convention and Visitors Authority to denominate the area. The Valley is affectionately referred to as the Ninth Island by Hawaii locals and Las Vegans alike, in part as a result of the lot of people initially from Hawaii that live in and routinely travel to Las Vegas. Considering that the 1990s, the Las Vegas Valley has actually seen quick growth, tripling its populace from 741,459 in 1990 to 2,227,053 estimated in 2018, enhancing to 2,421,685 in 2024. The Las Las vega Valley continues to be one of the fastest growing cities in the United States. In its fairly short background, it has established a diverse presence in global company, business, city development, and amusement, in addition to one of the most gone to vacationer destinations destinations on the planet. In 2014, a record-breaking 41 million individuals saw the Las Las vega area, creating a gross urbane product of more than $100 billion.

.

 

Artificial turf with rubber crumb infill
Side view of artificial turf
Diagram of the structure of modern artificial turf
Artificial turf square mats

Artificial turf is a surface of synthetic fibers made to look like natural grass, used in sports arenas, residential lawns and commercial applications that traditionally use grass. It is much more durable than grass and easily maintained without irrigation or trimming, although periodic cleaning is required. Stadiums that are substantially covered and/or at high latitudes often use artificial turf, as they typically lack enough sunlight for photosynthesis and substitutes for solar radiation are prohibitively expensive and energy-intensive. Disadvantages include increased risk of injury especially when used in athletic competition, as well as health and environmental concerns about the petroleum and toxic chemicals used in its manufacture.

Artificial turf first gained substantial attention in 1966, when ChemGrass was installed in the year-old Astrodome, developed by Monsanto and rebranded as AstroTurf, now a generic trademark (registered to a new owner) for any artificial turf.

The first-generation system of shortpile fibers without infill of the 1960s has largely been replaced by two more. The second features longer fibers and sand infill and the third adds recycled crumb rubber to the sand. Compared to earlier systems, modern artificial turf more closely resembles grass in appearance and is also considered safer for athletic competition. However, it is still not widely considered to be equal to grass. Sports clubs, leagues, unions and individual athletes have frequently spoken out and campaigned against it, while local governments have enacted and enforced laws restricting and/or banning its use.

History

[edit]

David Chaney, who moved to Raleigh, North Carolina, in 1960 and later served as Dean of the North Carolina State University College of Textiles, headed the team of Research Triangle Park researchers who created the first notable artificial turf. That accomplishment led Sports Illustrated to declare Chaney as the man "responsible for indoor major league baseball and millions of welcome mats."

Artificial turf was first installed in 1964 on a recreation area at the Moses Brown School in Providence, Rhode Island.[1] The material came to public prominence in 1966, when AstroTurf was installed in the Astrodome in Houston, Texas.[1] The state-of-the-art indoor stadium had attempted to use natural grass during its initial season in 1965, but this failed miserably and the field conditions were grossly inadequate during the second half of the season, with the dead grass painted green. Due to a limited supply of the new artificial grass, only the infield was installed before the Houston Astros' home opener in April 1966; the outfield was installed in early summer during an extended Astros road trip and first used after the All-Star Break in July.

The use of AstroTurf and similar surfaces became widespread in the U.S. and Canada in the early 1970s, installed in both indoor and outdoor stadiums used for baseball and football. More than 11,000 artificial turf playing fields have been installed nationally.[2] More than 1,200 were installed in the U.S. in 2013 alone, according to the industry group the Synthetic Turf Council.[2]

Sports applications

[edit]

Baseball

[edit]
Tropicana Field with its artificial turf field.
An artificial-turf field at a high school in Oregon.

Artificial turf was first used in Major League Baseball in the Houston Astrodome in 1966, replacing the grass field used when the stadium opened a year earlier. Even though the grass was specifically bred for indoor use, the dome's semi-transparent Lucite ceiling panels, which had been painted white to cut down on glare that bothered the players, did not pass enough sunlight to support the grass. For most of the 1965 season, the Astros played on green-painted dirt and dead grass.

The solution was to install a new type of artificial grass on the field, ChemGrass, which became known as AstroTurf. Given its early use, the term astroturf has since been genericized as a term for any artificial turf.[3] Because the supply of AstroTurf was still low, only a limited amount was available for the first home game. There was not enough for the entire outfield, but there was enough to cover the traditional grass portion of the infield. The outfield remained painted dirt until after the All-Star Break. The team was sent on an extended road trip before the break, and on July 19, 1966, the installation of the outfield portion of AstroTurf was completed.

The Chicago White Sox became the first team to install artificial turf in an outdoor stadium, as they used it only in the infield and adjacent foul territory at Comiskey Park from 1969 through 1975.[4] Artificial turf was later installed in other new multi-purpose stadiums such as Pittsburgh's Three Rivers Stadium, Philadelphia's Veterans Stadium, and Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium. Early AstroTurf baseball fields used the traditional all-dirt path, but starting in 1970 with Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium,[5] teams began using the "base cutout" layout on the diamond, with the only dirt being on the pitcher's mound, batter's circle, and in a five-sided diamond-shaped "sliding box" around each base. With this layout, a painted arc would indicate where the edge of the outfield grass would normally be, to assist fielders in positioning themselves properly. The last stadium in MLB to use this configuration was Rogers Centre in Toronto, when they switched to an all-dirt infield (but keeping the artificial turf) for the 2016 season.[6][7]

Artificial turf being installed on a baseball field in Queens, New York City.

The biggest difference in play on artificial turf was that the ball bounced higher than on real grass and also traveled faster, causing infielders to play farther back than they would normally so that they would have sufficient time to react. The ball also had a truer bounce than on grass so that on long throws fielders could deliberately bounce the ball in front of the player they were throwing to, with the certainty that it would travel in a straight line and not be deflected to the right or left. The biggest impact on the game of "turf", as it came to be called, was on the bodies of the players. The artificial surface, which was generally placed over a concrete base, had much less give to it than a traditional dirt and grass field did, which caused more wear-and-tear on knees, ankles, feet, and the lower back, possibly even shortening the careers of those players who played a significant portion of their games on artificial surfaces. Players also complained that the turf was much hotter than grass, sometimes causing the metal spikes to burn their feet or plastic ones to melt. These factors eventually provoked a number of stadiums, such as the Kansas City Royals' Kauffman Stadium, to switch from artificial turf back to natural grass.

In 2000, St. Petersburg's Tropicana Field became the first MLB field to use a third-generation artificial surface, FieldTurf. All other remaining artificial turf stadiums were either converted to third-generation surfaces or were replaced entirely by new natural grass stadiums. In a span of 13 years, between 1992 and 2005, the National League went from having half of its teams using artificial turf to all of them playing on natural grass. With the replacement of Minneapolis's Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome by Target Field in 2010, only two MLB stadiums used artificial turf from 2010 through 2018: Tropicana Field and Toronto's Rogers Centre. This number grew to three when the Arizona Diamondbacks switched Chase Field to artificial turf for the 2019 season; the stadium had grass from its opening in 1998 until 2018, but the difficulty of maintaining the grass in the stadium, which has a retractable roof and is located in a desert city, was cited as the reason for the switch.[8] In 2020, Miami's Marlins Park (now loanDepot Park) also switched to artificial turf for similar reasons, while the Texas Rangers' new Globe Life Field was opened with an artificial surface, as it is also a retractable roof ballpark in a hot weather city; this puts the number of teams using synthetic turf in MLB at five as of 2023.

American football

[edit]

The first professional American football team to play on artificial turf was the Houston Oilers, then part of the American Football League, who moved into the Astrodome in 1968, which had installed AstroTurf two years prior. In 1969, the University of Pennsylvania's Franklin Field in Philadelphia, at the time also home field of the Philadelphia Eagles, switched from grass to AstroTurf, making it the first National Football League stadium to use artificial turf.

In 2002, CenturyLink Field, originally planned to have a natural grass field, was instead surfaced with FieldTurf upon positive reaction from the Seattle Seahawks when they played on the surface at their temporary home of Husky Stadium during the 2000 and 2001 seasons. This would be the first of a leaguewide trend taking place over the next several seasons that would not only result in teams already using artificial surfaces for their fields switching to the new FieldTurf or other similar surfaces but would also see several teams playing on grass adopt a new surface. (The Indianapolis Colts' RCA Dome and the St. Louis Rams' Edward Jones Dome were the last two stadiums in the NFL to replace their first-generation AstroTurf surfaces for next-generation ones after the 2004 season). For example, after a three-year experiment with a natural surface, Giants Stadium went to FieldTurf for 2003, while M&T Bank Stadium added its own artificial surface the same year (it has since been removed and replaced with a natural surface, which the stadium had before installing the turf). Later examples include Paul Brown Stadium (now Paycor Stadium), which went from grass to turf in 2004; Gillette Stadium, which made the switch in 2006;[9] and NRG Stadium, which did so in 2015. As of 2021, 14 NFL fields out of 30 are artificial. NFL players overwhelmingly prefer natural grass over synthetic surfaces, according to a league survey conducted in 2010. When asked, "Which surface do you think is more likely to shorten your career?", 90% responded artificial turf.[10] When players were asked "Is the Turf versus Grass debate overblown or a real concern"[11] in an anonymous player survey, 83% believe it is a real concern while 12.3% believe it is overblown.

Following receiver Odell Beckham Jr.'s injury during Super Bowl LVI, other NFL players started calling for turf to be banned since the site of the game, SoFi Stadium, was a turf field.[12]

Arena football is played indoors on the older short-pile artificial turf.

Canadian football

[edit]

The first professional Canadian football stadium to use artificial turf was Empire Stadium in Vancouver, British Columbia, then home of the Canadian Football League's BC Lions, which installed 3M TartanTurf in 1970. Today, eight of the nine stadiums in the CFL currently use artificial turf, largely because of the harsh weather conditions in the latter-half of the season. The only one that does not is BMO Field in Toronto, which initially had an artificial pitch and has been shared by the CFL's Toronto Argonauts since 2016 (part of the endzones at that stadium are covered with artificial turf).[13] The first stadium to use the next-generation surface was Ottawa's Frank Clair Stadium (now TD Place Stadium), which the Ottawa Renegades used when they began play in 2002. The Saskatchewan Roughriders' Taylor Field was the only major professional sports venue in North America to use a second-generation artificial playing surface, Omniturf, which was used from 1988 to 2000, followed by AstroTurf from 2000 to 2007 and FieldTurf from 2007 to its 2016 closure.[14]

Cricket

[edit]

Some cricket pitches are made of synthetic grass[15] or of a hybrid of mostly natural and some artificial grass, with these "hybrid pitches" having been implemented across several parts of the United Kingdom[16] and Australia.[17] The first synthetic turf cricket field in the USA was opened in Fremont, California in 2016.[18]

Field hockey

[edit]

The introduction of synthetic surfaces has significantly changed the sport of field hockey. Since being introduced in the 1970s, competitions in western countries are now mostly played on artificial surfaces. This has increased the speed of the game considerably and changed the shape of hockey sticks to allow for different techniques, such as reverse stick trapping and hitting.

Field hockey artificial turf differs from artificial turf for other sports, in that it does not try to reproduce a grass feel, being made of shorter fibers. This allows the improvement in speed brought by earlier artificial turfs to be retained. This development is problematic for areas which cannot afford to build an extra artificial field for hockey alone. The International Hockey Federation and manufacturers are driving research in order to produce new fields that will be suitable for a variety of sports.

The use of artificial turf in conjunction with changes in the game's rules (e.g., the removal of offside, introduction of rolling substitutes and the self-pass, and to the interpretation of obstruction) have contributed significantly to change the nature of the game, greatly increasing the speed and intensity of play as well as placing far greater demands on the conditioning of the players.

Association football

[edit]
Aspmyra, Norway: home of the football club FK Bodø/Glimt
A slide tackle driving up crumbed rubber in the playing surface

The use of artificial turf, and whether they are not allowed or not, varies between different tournaments and time periods. Though grass is preferred in general in association football, artificial turf is found in areas where it is seen as impractical to maintain natural grass season-long, with causes including very cold climates (For instance Norway's Eliteserien) or multi-purpose stadiums (Seattle's Lumen Field).

Use permitted

[edit]

Use prohibited

[edit]

History in United Kingdom

[edit]

Some association football clubs in Europe installed synthetic surfaces in the 1980s, which were called "plastic pitches" (often derisively) in countries such as England. There, four professional club venues had adopted them; Queens Park Rangers's Loftus Road (1981–1988), Luton Town's Kenilworth Road (1985–1991), Oldham Athletic's Boundary Park (1986–1991) and Preston North End's Deepdale (1986–1994). QPR had been the first team to install an artificial pitch at their stadium in 1981, but were the first to remove it when they did so in 1988.

Artificial pitches were banned from top-flight (then First Division) football in 1991, forcing Oldham Athletic to remove their artificial pitch after their promotion to the First Division in 1991, while then top-flight Luton Town also removed their artificial pitch at the same time. The last Football League team to have an artificial pitch in England was Preston North End, who removed their pitch in 1994 after eight years in use. Artificial pitches were banned from the top four divisions from 1995.

Artificial turf gained a bad reputation[neutrality is disputed] globally, with fans and especially with players. The first-generation artificial turf surfaces were carpet-like in their look and feel, and thus, a far harder surface than grass and soon became known[by whom?] as an unforgiving playing surface that was prone to cause more injuries, and in particular, more serious joint injuries, than would comparatively be suffered on a grass surface. This turf was also regarded as aesthetically unappealing to many fans[weasel words].

In 1981, London football club Queens Park Rangers dug up its grass pitch and installed an artificial one. Others followed, and by the mid-1980s there were four artificial surfaces in operation in the English league. They soon became a national joke: the ball pinged round like it was made of rubber, the players kept losing their footing, and anyone who fell over risked carpet burns. Unsurprisingly, fans complained that the football was awful to watch and, one by one, the clubs returned to natural grass.[21]

In November 2011, it was reported that a number of English football clubs were interested in using artificial pitches again on economic grounds.[22] As of January 2020, artificial pitches are not permitted in the Premier League or Football League but are permitted in the National League and lower divisions. Bromley are an example of an English football club who currently use a third-generation artificial pitch.[23] In 2018, Sutton United were close to achieving promotion to the Football League and the debate in England about artificial pitches resurfaced again. It was reported that, if Sutton won promotion, they would subsequently be demoted two leagues if they refused to replace their pitch with natural grass.[24] After Harrogate Town's promotion to the Football League in 2020, the club was obliged to install a natural grass pitch at Wetherby Road;[25] and after winning promotion in 2021 Sutton Utd were also obliged to tear up their artificial pitch and replace it with grass, at a cost of more than £500,000.[26] Artificial pitches are permitted in all rounds of the FA Cup competition.

History elsewhere

[edit]

In the 1990s, many North American soccer clubs also removed their artificial surfaces and re-installed grass, while others moved to new stadiums with state-of-the-art grass surfaces that were designed to withstand cold temperatures where the climate demanded it. The use of artificial turf was later banned by FIFA, UEFA and by many domestic football associations, but FIFA and UEFA allowed it again from the mid-2000's (UEFA from the 2005–06 season onwards), provided that the turfs are FIFA Recommended. UEFA has now been heavily involved in programs to test artificial turf, with tests made in several grounds meeting with FIFA approval. A team of UEFA, FIFA and German company Polytan conducted tests in the Stadion Salzburg Wals-Siezenheim in Salzburg, Austria which had matches played on it in UEFA Euro 2008. It is the second FIFA 2 Star approved artificial turf in a European domestic top flight, after Dutch club Heracles Almelo received the FIFA certificate in August 2005.[27] The tests were approved.[28]

FIFA originally launched its FIFA Quality Concept in February 2001.

A full international fixture for the 2008 European Championships was played on October 17, 2007, between England and Russia on an artificial surface, which was installed to counteract adverse weather conditions, at the Luzhniki Stadium in Moscow.[29][30] It was one of the first full international games to be played on such a surface approved by FIFA and UEFA. The latter ordered the 2008 European Champions League final hosted in the same stadium in May 2008 to place on grass, so a temporary natural grass field was installed just for the final.

In 2007, UEFA stressed that artificial turf should only be considered an option where climatic conditions necessitate.[31] One Desso "hybrid grass" product incorporates both natural grass and artificial elements.[32]

In June 2009, following a match played at Estadio Ricardo Saprissa in Costa Rica, American national team manager Bob Bradley called on FIFA to "have some courage" and ban artificial surfaces.[33]

FIFA designated a star system for artificial turf fields that have undergone a series of tests that examine quality and performance based on a two star system.[34] Recommended two-star fields may be used for FIFA Final Round Competitions as well as for UEFA Europa League and Champions League matches.[35] There are currently 130 FIFA Recommended 2-Star installations in the world.[36]

In 2009, FIFA launched the Preferred Producer Initiative to improve the quality of artificial football turf at each stage of the life cycle (manufacturing, installation and maintenance).[37] Currently, there are five manufacturers that were selected by FIFA: Act Global, Limonta, Desso, GreenFields, and Edel Grass. These firms have made quality guarantees directly to FIFA and have agreed to increased research and development.

In 2010, Estadio Omnilife with an artificial turf opened in Guadalajara to be the new home of Chivas, one of the most popular teams in Mexico. The owner of Chivas, Jorge Vergara, defended the reasoning behind using artificial turf because the stadium was designed to be "environment friendly and as such, having grass would result [in] using too much water."[38] Some players criticized the field, saying its harder surface caused many injuries. When Johan Cruyff became the adviser of the team, he recommended the switch to natural grass, which the team did in 2012.[39]

The 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup took place entirely on artificial surfaces, as the event was played in Canada, where almost all of the country's stadiums use artificial turf due to climate issues. This plan garnered criticism from players and fans, some believing the artificial surfaces make players more susceptible to injuries. Over fifty of the female athletes protested against the use of artificial turf on the basis of gender discrimination.[40][41] Australia winger Caitlin Foord said that after playing 90 minutes there was no difference to her post-match recovery – a view shared by the rest of the squad. The squad spent much time preparing on the surface and had no problems with its use in Winnipeg. "We've been training on [artificial] turf pretty much all year so I think we're kind of used to it in that way ... I think grass or turf you can still pull up sore after a game so it's definitely about getting the recovery in and getting it right", Foord said.[42] A lawsuit was filed on October 1, 2014, in an Ontario tribunal court by a group of women's international soccer players against FIFA and the Canadian Soccer Association and specifically points out that in 1994 FIFA spent $2 million to plant natural grass over artificial turf in New Jersey and Detroit.[43] Various celebrities showed their support for the women soccer players in defense of their lawsuit, including actor Tom Hanks, NBA player Kobe Bryant and U.S. men's soccer team keeper Tim Howard. Even with the possibility of boycotts, FIFA's head of women's competitions, Tatjana Haenni, made it clear that "we play on artificial turf and there's no Plan B."[44][45]

The first stadium to use artificial turf in Brazil was Atlético Paranaense's Arena da Baixada in 2016. In 2020, the administration of Allianz Parque, home of Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras, started the implementation of the second artificial pitch in the country.[46]

In 2024, the Eredivisie banned artificial turfs, meaning hybrid grass and natural grass became mandatory, starting from the 2025-26 season.[47]

In UEFA tournaments, teams who are used to playing on artificial turf are seen as having a large home advantage against teams who don't, as was the case for Bodø/Glimt's semi-final campaign in the 2024–25 UEFA Europa League.[48]

Rugby union

[edit]

Rugby union also uses artificial surfaces at a professional level. Infill fields are used by English Premiership Rugby teams Gloucester, Newcastle Falcons, Saracens F.C. and the now defunct Worcester Warriors, as well as United Rugby Championship teams Cardiff, Edinburgh and Glasgow Warriors. Some fields, including Twickenham Stadium, have incorporated a hybrid field, with grass and synthetic fibers used on the surface. This allows for the field to be much more hard wearing, making it less susceptible to weather conditions and frequent use.

Tennis

[edit]

Carpet has been used as a surface for indoor tennis courts for decades, though the first carpets used were more similar to home carpets than a synthetic grass. After the introduction of AstroTurf, it came to be used for tennis courts, both indoor and outdoor, though only a small minority of courts use the surface.[49][50] Both infill and non-infill versions are used, and are typically considered medium-fast to fast surfaces under the International Tennis Federation's classification scheme.[49] A distinct form found in tennis is an "artificial clay" surface,[49] which seeks to simulate a clay court by using a very short pile carpet with an infill of the same loose aggregate used for clay courts that rises above the carpet fibers.[49]

Tennis courts such as Wimbledon are considering using an artificial hybrid grass to replace their natural lawn courts. Such systems incorporate synthetic fibers into natural grass to create a more durable surface on which to play.[51] Such hybrid surfaces are currently used for some association football stadiums, including Wembley Stadium.

Golf

[edit]

Synthetic turf can also be used in the golf industry, such as on driving ranges, putting greens and even in some circumstances tee boxes. For low budget courses, particularly those catering to casual golfers, synthetic putting greens offer the advantage of being a relatively cheap alternative to installing and maintaining grass greens, but are much more similar to real grass in appearance and feel compared to sand greens which are the traditional alternative surface. Because of the vast areas of golf courses and the damage from clubs during shots, it is not feasible to surface fairways with artificial turf.

Pesäpallo

[edit]
The surface on Veikkolan pesäpallostadion in Lappajärvi.

Though all pesäpallo teams in the higher leagues (including Superpesis) play on clay courts, several teams' stadiums use carpet-type artificial grass below the clay.

Motor racing

[edit]

Artificial grass is used to line the perimeter of some sections of some motor circuits, and offers less grip than some other surfaces.[52] It can pose an obstacle to drivers if it gets caught on their car.[53]

Other applications

[edit]

Landscaping

[edit]
A home's yard with artificial grass.

Since the early 1990s, the use of synthetic grass in the more arid western states of the United States has moved beyond athletic fields to residential and commercial landscaping.[54] New water saving programs, as of 2019, which grant rebates for turf removal, do not accept artificial turf as replacement and require a minimum of plants.[55][56]

The use of artificial grass for convenience sometimes faces opposition: Legislation frequently seeks to preserve natural gardens and fully water permeable surfaces, therefore restricting the use of hardscape and plantless areas, including artificial turf. In several locations in different countries, homeowners have been fined, ordered to remove artificial turf and/or had to defend themselves in courts. Many of these restrictions can be found in local bylaws and ordinances. These not always applied in a consistent manner,[57][58][59] especially in municipalities that utilize a complaint-based model for enforcing local laws.

Sunlight reflections from nearby windows can cause artificial turf to melt. This can be avoided by adding perforated vinyl privacy window film adhesive to the outside of the window causing the reflection.

Airports

[edit]

Artificial turf has been used at airports.[60] Here it provides several advantages over natural turf – it does not support wildlife, it has high visual contrast with runways in all seasons, it reduces foreign object damage (FOD) since the surface has no rocks or clumps, and it drains well.[61]

Some artificial turf systems allow for the integration of fiber-optic fibers into the turf. This would allow for runway lighting to be embedded in artificial landing surfaces for aircraft (or lighting or advertisements to be directly embedded in a playing surface).[62]

Tanks for octopuses

[edit]

Artificial turf is commonly used for tanks containing octopusses, in particular the Giant Pacific octopus since it is a reliable way to prevent the octopusses from escaping their tank, as they prevent the suction cups on the tentacles from getting a tight seal.[63]

Environmental and safety concerns

[edit]

Environmental footprint

[edit]

The first major academic review of the environmental and health risks and benefits of artificial turf was published in 2014;[64] it was followed by extensive research on possible risks to human health, but holistic analyses of the environmental footprint of artificial turf compared with natural turf only began to emerge in the 2020s,[65][66] and frameworks to support informed policymaking were still lacking.[67][68] Evaluating the relative environmental footprints of natural and artificial turf is complex, with outcomes depending on a wide range of factors, including (to give the example of a sports field):[64]

  • what ecosystem services are lost by converting a site to a sports pitch
  • how resource-intensive is the landscaping work and transport of materials to create a pitch
  • whether input materials are recycled and whether these are recycled again at the end of the pitch's life
  • how resource-intensive and damaging maintenance is (whether through water, fertiliser, weed-killer, reapplication of rubber crumb, snow-clearing, etc.)
  • how intensively the facility is used, for how long, and whether surface type can reduce the overall number of pitches required

Artificial turf has been shown to contribute to global warming by absorbing significantly more radiation than living turf and, to a lesser extent, by displacing living plants that could sequester carbon dioxide through photosynthesis;[69] a study at New Mexico State University found that in that environment, water-cooling of artificial turf can demand as much water as natural turf.[70] However, a 2022 study that used real-world data to model a ten-year-life-cycle environmental footprint for a new natural-turf soccer field compared with an artificial-turf field found that the natural-turf field contributed twice as much to global warming as the artificial one (largely due to a more resource-intensive construction phase), while finding that the artificial turf would likely cause more pollution of other kinds. It promoted improvements to usual practice such as the substitution of cork for rubber in artificial pitches and more drought-resistant grasses and electric mowing in natural ones.[65] In 2021, a Zurich University of Applied Sciences study for the city of Zurich, using local data on extant pitches, found that, per hour of use, natural turf had the lowest environmental footprint, followed by artificial turf with no infill, and then artificial turf using an infill (e.g. granulated rubber). However, because it could tolerate more hours of use, unfilled artificial turf often had the lowest environmental footprint in practice, by reducing the total number of pitches required. The study recommended optimising the use of existing pitches before building new ones, and choosing the best surface for the likely intensity of use.[66] Another suggestion is the introduction of green roofs to offset the conversion of grassland to artificial turf.[71]

Maintenance

[edit]

Contrary to popular belief, artificial turf is not maintenance free. It requires regular maintenance, such as raking and patching, to keep it functional and safe.[72]

Pollution and associated health risks

[edit]

Some artificial turf uses infill such as silicon sand, but most uses granulated rubber, referred to as "crumb rubber". Granulated rubber can be made from recycled car tires and may carry heavy metals, PFAS chemicals, and other chemicals of environmental concern. The synthetic fibers of artificial turf are also subject to degradation. Thus chemicals from artificial turfs leach into the environment, and artificial turf is a source of microplastics pollution and rubber pollution in air, fresh-water, sea and soil environments.[73][74][75][76][77][78][64][excessive citations] In Norway, Sweden, and at least some other places, the rubber granulate from artificial turf infill constitutes the second largest source of microplastics in the environment after the tire and road wear particles that make up a large portion of the fine road debris.[79][80][81] As early as 2007, Environment and Human Health, Inc., a lobby-group, proposed a moratorium on the use of ground-up rubber tires in fields and playgrounds based on health concerns;[82] in September 2022, the European Commission made a draft proposal to restrict the use of microplastic granules as infill in sports fields.[83]

What is less clear is how likely this pollution is in practice to harm humans or other organisms and whether these environmental costs outweigh the benefits of artificial turf, with many scientific papers and government agencies (such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency) calling for more research.[2] A 2018 study published in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution analyzed the chemicals found in samples of tire crumbs, some used to install school athletic fields, and identified 92 chemicals only about half of which had ever been studied for their health effects and some of which are known to be carcinogenic or irritants. It stated "caution would argue against use of these materials where human exposure is likely, and this is especially true for playgrounds and athletic playing fields where young people may be affected".[84] Conversely, a 2017 study in Sports Medicine argued that "regular physical activity during adolescence and early adulthood helps prevent cancer later in life. Restricting the use or availability of all-weather year-round synthetic fields and thereby potentially reducing exercise could, in the long run, actually increase cancer incidence, as well as cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses."[85]

The possibility that carcinogenic substances in artificial turf could increase risks of human cancer (the artificial turf–cancer hypothesis) gained a particularly high profile in the first decades of the twenty-first century and attracted extensive study, with scientific reports around 2020 finding cancer-risks in modern artificial turf negligible.[86][87][88][89] But concerns have extended to other human-health risks, such as endocrine disruption that might affect early puberty, obesity, and children's attention spans.[90][91][92][93] Potential harm to fish[75] and earthworm[94] populations has also been shown.

A study for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection analyzed lead and other metals in dust kicked into the air by physical activity on five artificial turf fields. The results suggest that even low levels of activity on the field can cause particulate matter containing these chemicals to get into the air where it can be inhaled and be harmful. The authors state that since no level of lead exposure is considered safe for children, "only a comprehensive mandated testing of fields can provide assurance that no health hazard on these fields exists from lead or other metals used in their construction and maintenance."[95]

Kinesiological health risks

[edit]

A number of health and safety concerns have been raised about artificial turf.[2] Friction between skin and older generations of artificial turf can cause abrasions and/or burns to a much greater extent than natural grass.[96] Artificial turf tends to retain heat from the sun and can be much hotter than natural grass with prolonged exposure to the sun.[97]

There is some evidence that periodic disinfection of artificial turf is required as pathogens are not broken down by natural processes in the same manner as natural grass. Despite this, a 2006 study suggests certain microbial life is less active in artificial turf.[96]

There is evidence showing higher rates of player injury on artificial turf. By November 1971, the injury toll on first-generation artificial turf had reached a threshold that resulted in congressional hearings by the House subcommittee on commerce and finance.[98][99][100] In a study performed by the National Football League Injury and Safety Panel, published in the October 2012 issue of the American Journal of Sports Medicine, Elliott B. Hershman et al. reviewed injury data from NFL games played between 2000 and 2009, finding that "the injury rate of knee sprains as a whole was 22% higher on FieldTurf than on natural grass. While MCL sprains did not occur at a rate significantly higher than on grass, rates of ACL sprains were 67% higher on FieldTurf."[101] Metatarsophalangeal joint sprain, known as "turf toe" when the big toe is involved, is named from the injury being associated with playing sports on rigid surfaces such as artificial turf and is a fairly common injury among professional American football players. Artificial turf is a harder surface than grass and does not have much "give" when forces are placed on it.[102]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Dave Brady, "It's All So Artificial: The Uncommon Ground", Petersen's 12th Pro Football Annual, 1972. Los Angeles: Petersen Publishing Co., 1972; pp. 62–65.
  2. ^ a b c d Weeks, Jennifer (2015). "Turf Wars". Distillations Magazine. 1 (3): 34–37. Archived from the original on March 21, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2018.
  3. ^ "Definition of Astroturf – Dictionary.com". dictionary.com. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023. This sense of the word has come to be frequently used as a generic term for any artificial turf (in the same way that other brand names have been genericized, such as xerox). When used this way, it's often seen in lowercase (astroturf).
  4. ^ "Chicago Tribune – Historical Newspapers". Archives.chicagotribune.com. Archived from the original on November 5, 2016. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  5. ^ Moore, Jack (July 2, 2015). "Throwback Thursday: Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium and the Era of Multipurpose Mistakes". vice.com. Vice. Retrieved April 13, 2023. It was the first stadium to include dirt sliding pits around each base, something that has become standard in every turf baseball field built since.
  6. ^ "Blue Jays adding dirt infield at Rogers Centre". MLB.com. February 10, 2016. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  7. ^ "Blue Jays begin work on all-dirt infield at Rogers Centre". Toronto Star. February 11, 2016.
  8. ^ "Arizona Diamondbacks installing synthetic grass at Chase Field". azcentral.com. October 12, 2018. Retrieved October 13, 2018.
  9. ^ "Pats sign Testaverde; Gillette Stadium's grass field replaced with Field Turf". November 14, 2006. Archived from the original on April 19, 2012. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  10. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on January 11, 2015. Retrieved May 15, 2015.cite web: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  11. ^ Staff, The Athletic NFL. "Anonymous NFL player poll 2023: Best player? Biggest trash talker? Most annoying fans?". The New York Times. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  12. ^ "Odell Beckham Jr.'s injury in Super Bowl prompts NFL players to speak out against turf fields". sportingnews.com. February 14, 2022. Retrieved February 16, 2022.
  13. ^ "BMO Field: New renovations accommodate TFC, Argos – CBC Sports". Cbc.ca. Archived from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  14. ^ "History". Saskatchewan Roughriders. June 12, 2002. Retrieved January 10, 2021. In 1988, the Roughriders replaced the first artificial turf with a new type of system called OmniTurf. Unlike AstroTurf, OmniTurf was an inlay turf system, which relied on 300 tons of sand to hold it in place (rather than the traditional glued-down system). Over the years, a number of problems occurred with this system and it eventually became necessary to replace it prior to its usable age being reached.
  15. ^ "Artificial (pitch) intelligence – all you need to know". Cricket World. June 12, 2015. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
  16. ^ Nolan, Grace (April 4, 2019). "SIS Pitches uses hybrid grass technology to transform cricket". British Plastics and Rubber. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
  17. ^ "Stitched pitch – SACA adds hybrid wickets". Cricket SA. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
  18. ^ "Fremont: First official, fully lighted cricket field opens Aug. 21". The Mercury News. August 11, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
  19. ^ a b Stuart James (October 11, 2024). "Bolivia are thriving at high altitude in their new home at El Alto – 4,150m above sea level". The Athletic. Retrieved May 6, 2025.
  20. ^ "Artificial pitches to be banned in Premiership from 2026". BBC. April 30, 2024. Retrieved May 6, 2025.
  21. ^ Lawton, Graham (June 4, 2005). "Field battle over artificial grass". New Scientist (2502): 35. Archived from the original on February 17, 2006. Retrieved January 11, 2008.
  22. ^ "Clubs want artificial turf return". BBC News. November 18, 2011.
  23. ^ "Artificial 3G Pitches: Coming to a ground near you?". Football Ground Guide. April 26, 2016. Archived from the original on October 31, 2016. Retrieved October 30, 2016.
  24. ^ "Plastic liberals vs conservative stick-in-the-muds: The debate around artificial pitches which isn't going away". The Independent. London. February 28, 2018. Retrieved January 25, 2020.
  25. ^ "National League promotion final: Harrogate Town beat Notts County 3-1 to secure place in League 2". BBC Sport. August 2, 2020. Retrieved August 2, 2020.
  26. ^ "Sutton United: Replacing pitch will cost promoted club over £500,000". BBC Sport. June 2, 2021. Retrieved July 7, 2021.
  27. ^ Salzburg turf approval. UEFA.com (January 12, 2006)
  28. ^ Mark Chaplin (November 10, 2004) Approval for artificial fields. UEFA.com
  29. ^ "England to play on synthetic turf". BBC News. July 11, 2007. Archived from the original on October 8, 2007. Retrieved January 11, 2008.
  30. ^ "Field 'No Excuse' For England". Sporting Life UK. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved January 11, 2008.
  31. ^ Martyn Ziegler (October 10, 2007). "England could slip up on plastic field, warns Ferguson". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on January 12, 2008. Retrieved January 11, 2008.
  32. ^ "Desso GrassMaster hybrid grass > reinforced natural grass | Desso Sports Systems". Dessosports.com. Archived from the original on December 10, 2015. Retrieved December 24, 2015.
  33. ^ "Plastic pitches will be a pain". The New Indian Express. May 16, 2012. Retrieved May 2, 2025.
  34. ^ "FIFA Quality Concept – Handbook of Test Methods for Football Turf" (PDF). FIFA. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 3, 2018. Retrieved July 20, 2017.
  35. ^ "Football Turf". FIFA. Archived from the original on February 28, 2008.
  36. ^ "Football Fields". FIFA. Archived from the original on February 28, 2008.
  37. ^ [1] Archived December 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  38. ^ "Chivas quitará el pasto sintético que costó 1 mdd – construccion". Obrasweb.mx. Archived from the original on August 1, 2018. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  39. ^ "El Estadio Omnilife, listo con pasto natural". Mediotiempo.com. July 19, 2012. Archived from the original on July 8, 2018. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  40. ^ "USWNT stars not backing down on artificial playing surface stance". Fox Sports. Archived from the original on October 20, 2014. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  41. ^ "elite female players sue". ESPN. September 26, 2014. Archived from the original on October 3, 2014. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  42. ^ Dominic Bossi (June 10, 2015). "Matildas stay out of turf war at women's World Cup". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on January 9, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2015.
  43. ^ "Equalizer Soccer – Players officially file lawsuit against FIFA, CSA over artificial turf at 2015 Women's World Cup". Womens.soccerly.com. Archived from the original on October 5, 2014. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  44. ^ "Players file lawsuit in Canada over artificial Women's World Cup turf". Global News. October 1, 2014. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  45. ^ "FIFA officials to inspect BC Place turf in light of controversy". Global News. October 7, 2014. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  46. ^ "Palmeiras begin installing synthetic pitch at Allianz Parque". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on January 14, 2020. Retrieved January 25, 2020.
  47. ^ Dennis van Bergen; Sjoerd Mossou (October 20, 2022). "Kunstgras definitief verdrongen: eredivisieclubs vanaf de zomer van 2025 verplicht op écht gras" (in Dutch). AD. Retrieved May 2, 2025.
  48. ^ Rae Knwhoca (April 30, 2025). "Ange Postecoglou reveals what he learned last time he played Bodo/Glimt". Spurs Web. Retrieved May 3, 2025.
  49. ^ a b c d "ITF surface descriptions". Itftennis.com. Archived from the original on June 13, 2018. Retrieved August 1, 2018.
  50. ^ "Tennis". Dow.com. August 3, 2001. Archived from the original on December 15, 2015. Retrieved December 24, 2015.
  51. ^ "Wimbledon considering controversial plans to introduce artificial grass courts". Tennis365. Archived from the original on July 31, 2018. Retrieved July 31, 2018.
  52. ^ Benson, Andrew (June 11, 2019). "Sebastian Vettel: F1's rules-for-everything culture led to Canada penalty, says GPDA boss". BBC Sport. Retrieved April 11, 2021.
  53. ^ "Korean GP: Hamilton hampered by loose astroturf". BBC Sport. October 12, 2012. Retrieved April 11, 2021.
  54. ^ Hall, Janet (March 11, 2018). "Pros and Cons: Artificial Grass Versus a Live Lawn". Archived from the original on May 1, 2018. Retrieved April 30, 2018.
  55. ^ McNary, Sharon (September 16, 2019). "You Can Rip Out Your SoCal Lawn For Money Again – Now Without Landscaping Abominations". LAist. Archived from the original on April 13, 2020. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
  56. ^ "Turf Replacement Program, Terms & Conditions". SoCal Water$mart. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
  57. ^ Richards, Stefanie (September 12, 2019). "Council bans fake grass from city verges". INDaily Adelaide Independent News.
  58. ^ Yuen, Kelda (July 29, 2019). "'It breaks my heart to do it': Toronto homeowner ordered to remove fake grass". CBC News. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
  59. ^ Gehrke, Robert (July 10, 2019). "Gehrke: Salt Lake City should revisit its ban on artificial grass and give some leniency to property owners". The Salt Lake City Tribune.
  60. ^ "Airside Applications for Artificial Turf" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. 2006. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 14, 2012. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  61. ^ "Going Green – Artificial Turf for Tortoise Troubles and More". April 13, 2017.
  62. ^ Monte Burke (November 27, 2006). "Field of Screens". Forbes. Archived from the original on December 15, 2007. Retrieved January 11, 2008.
  63. ^ "Exhibit Galleries Blog". galleries.neaq.org. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  64. ^ a b c Cheng H, Hu Y, Reinhard M (2014). "Environmental and health impacts of artificial turf: a review" (PDF). Environ Sci Technol. 48 (4): 2114–29. doi:10.1021/es4044193. PMID 24467230. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 29, 2024. Retrieved July 1, 2023. The major concerns stem from the infill material that is typically derived from scrap tires. Tire rubber crumb contains a range of organic contaminants and heavy metals that can volatilize into the air and/or leach into the percolating rainwater, thereby posing a potential risk to the environment and human health.
  65. ^ a b Russo, Carlo; Cappelletti, Giulio Mario; Nicoletti, Giuseppe Martino (July 1, 2022). "The product environmental footprint approach to compare the environmental performances of artificial and natural turf". Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 95: 106800. Bibcode:2022EIARv..9506800R. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106800. ISSN 0195-9255. S2CID 248644133.
  66. ^ a b René Itten, Lukas Glauser und Matthias Stucki, "Life Cycle Assessment of Artificial and Natural Turf Sports Fields – Executive Summary" (Wädenswil: ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, 2021); cf. "Ökobilanzierung von Rasensportfeldern: Natur-, Kunststoff- und Hybridrasen der Stadt Zürich im Vergleich" (Wädenswil: ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, 2020), doi:10.21256/zhaw-20774.
  67. ^ Barnes, Michael R; Watkins, Eric (September 30, 2022). "'Greenness' in the Eye of the Beholder: Comparing Perceptions of Sustainability and Well-being Between Artificial and Natural Turfgrass". Cities and the Environment. 15 (1). doi:10.15365/cate.202.150102. ISSN 1932-7048. S2CID 252668065.
  68. ^ Straw, C. M.; McCullough, B. P.; Segars, C.; Daher, B.; Patterson, M. S. (September 1, 2022). "Reimagining Sustainable Community Sports Fields of the Future: a Framework for Convergent Science-Stakeholder Decision-Making". Circular Economy and Sustainability. 2 (3): 1267–1277. Bibcode:2022CirES...2.1267S. doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00115-z. ISSN 2730-5988. S2CID 242002500.
  69. ^ Golden, Leslie M. (2021) "The Contribution of Artificial Turf to Global Warming," Sustainability and Climate Change, December,14 (6) 436-449; http://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2021.0038
  70. ^ Kanaan, Ahmed; Sevostianova, Elena; Leinauer, Bernd; Sevostianov, Igor (October 2020). "Water Requirements for Cooling Artificial Turf". Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 146 (10). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001506. ISSN 0733-9437. S2CID 224884193.
  71. ^ Julian E. Lozano and Shon Ferguson, "Ecosystem services for compensation of artificial turf systems" (May 2021).
  72. ^ Jastifer JR, McNitt AS, Mack CD, Kent RW, McCullough KA, Coughlin MJ, Anderson RB (2019). "Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety". Sports Health (Review). 11 (1): 84–90. doi:10.1177/1941738118793378. PMC 6299344. PMID 30096021.
  73. ^ Lerner, Sharon (October 8, 2019). "Toxic PFAS Chemicals Found in Artificial Turf". The Intercept. Retrieved January 4, 2020.
  74. ^ Celeiro, Maria; Armada, Daniel; Ratola, Nuno; Dagnac, Thierry; de Boer, Jacob; Llompart, Maria (May 1, 2021). "Evaluation of chemicals of environmental concern in crumb rubber and water leachates from several types of synthetic turf football pitches". Chemosphere. 270: 128610. Bibcode:2021Chmsp.27028610C. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128610. hdl:1871.1/b88f1b78-db15-4e7c-9129-91bc833e35e3. ISSN 0045-6535. PMID 33121811. S2CID 226206761.
  75. ^ a b Chiba, Rihito; Fujinuma, Ryosuke; Yoshitomi, Tomoyasu; Shimizu, Yasuo; Kobayashi, Makito (January 24, 2023). "Ingestion of rubber tips of artificial turf fields by goldfish". Scientific Reports. 13 (1): 1344. Bibcode:2023NatSR..13.1344C. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28672-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 9873930. PMID 36693897.
  76. ^ "Microplastic Pollution from Artificial Grass – A Field Guide". KIMO. February 27, 2017. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017.
  77. ^ "Artificial Turf. Why it is not the answer". SELVA. Archived from the original on August 3, 2016. Retrieved April 19, 2017.
  78. ^ "Microplastics in agricultural soils: A reason to worry?". Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA). February 3, 2017. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017. Microplastics are increasingly seen as an environmental problem of global proportions. While the focus to date has been on microplastics in the ocean and their effects on marine life, microplastics in soils have largely been overlooked. Researchers are concerned about the lack of knowledge regarding potential consequences of microplastics in agricultural landscapes from application of sewage sludge.
  79. ^ Kole, Pieter Jan; Löhr, Ansje J.; Van Belleghem, Frank; Ragas, Ad; Kole, Pieter Jan; Löhr, Ansje J.; Van Belleghem, Frank G. A. J.; Ragas, Ad M. J. (October 20, 2017). "Wear and Tear of Tyres: A Stealthy Source of Microplastics in the Environment". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 14 (10): 1265. doi:10.3390/ijerph14101265. PMC 5664766. PMID 29053641.
  80. ^ Bø, S M; Bohne, R A; Aas, B; Hansen, L M (November 1, 2020). "Material flow analysis for Norway's artificial turfs". IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 588 (4): 042068. Bibcode:2020E&ES..588d2068B. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042068. hdl:11250/2724609. ISSN 1755-1307. S2CID 229516855.
  81. ^ "Tire wear foremost source of microplastics". IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. March 29, 2016. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017. researchers have ranked the sources of microplastic particles by size. The amount of microplastic particles emitted by traffic is estimated to 13 500 tonnes per year. Artificial turf ranks as the second largest source of emissions and is responsible for approximately 2300-3900 tonnes per year.
  82. ^ Brown, Sc.D., David R. (2007). Artificial Turf (PDF) (Report). The Board of Environment & Human Health, Inc. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 10, 2008. Retrieved December 21, 2007.
  83. ^ "COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… of XXX amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards synthetic polymer microparticles". The European Commission. September 23, 2022. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
  84. ^ Benoit G & Demars S (2018). "Evaluation of organic and inorganic compounds extractable by multiple methods from commercially available crumb rubber mulch". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 229 (3): 64. Bibcode:2018WASP..229...64B. doi:10.1007/s11270-018-3711-7. S2CID 103861679.
  85. ^ Bleyer, Archie (December 1, 2017). "Synthetic Turf Fields, Crumb Rubber, and Alleged Cancer Risk". Sports Medicine. 47 (12): 2437–2441. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0735-x. ISSN 1179-2035. PMID 28493060. S2CID 46183771.
  86. ^ "Granules and mulches on sports pitches and playgrounds – ECHA". echa.europa.eu. Retrieved July 1, 2023.
  87. ^ Perkins, AN; Inayat-Hussain, SH; Deziel, NC; et al. (2019). "Evaluation of potential carcinogenicity of organic chemicals in synthetic turf crumb rubber". Environmental Research. 169: 163–172. Bibcode:2019ER....169..163P. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.018. PMC 6396308. PMID 30458352.
  88. ^ Pronk, Marja E. J.; Woutersen, Marjolijn; Herremans, Joke M. M. (May 2020). "Synthetic turf pitches with rubber granulate infill: are there health risks for people playing sports on such pitches?". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 30 (3): 567–584. Bibcode:2020JESEE..30..567P. doi:10.1038/s41370-018-0106-1. ISSN 1559-064X. PMC 7181390. PMID 30568187.
  89. ^ Schneider, Klaus; Bierwisch, Anne; Kaiser, Eva (May 20, 2020). "ERASSTRI – European risk assessment study on synthetic turf rubber infill – Part 3: Exposure and risk characterisation". Science of the Total Environment. 718: 137721. Bibcode:2020ScTEn.71837721S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137721. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 32173010. S2CID 212729483.
  90. ^ Armada, Daniel; Llompart, Maria; Celeiro, Maria; Garcia-Castro, Pablo; Ratola, Nuno; Dagnac, Thierry; de Boer, Jacob (March 15, 2022). "Global evaluation of the chemical hazard of recycled tire crumb rubber employed on worldwide synthetic turf football pitches". Science of the Total Environment. 812: 152542. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.81252542A. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152542. hdl:10347/27898. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 34952075. S2CID 245432545.
  91. ^ Colon, I (2000). "Identification of phthalate esters in the serum of young Puerto Rican girls with premature breast development". Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 (9): 895–900. doi:10.1289/ehp.108-2556932. PMC 2556932. PMID 11017896.
  92. ^ Newbold, RR (2009). "Environmental estrogens and obesity". Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 304 (1–2): 84–89. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.024. PMC 2682588. PMID 19433252.
  93. ^ Grun, F. (2009). "Endocrine disruptors as obesogens". Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 304 (1–2): 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.018. PMC 2713042. PMID 19433244.
  94. ^ Pochron, Sharon T.; Fiorenza, Andrew; Sperl, Cassandra; Ledda, Brianne; Lawrence Patterson, Charles; Tucker, Clara C.; Tucker, Wade; Ho, Yuwan Lisa; Panico, Nicholas (April 2017). "The response of earthworms ( Eisenia fetida ) and soil microbes to the crumb rubber material used in artificial turf fields". Chemosphere. 173: 557–562. Bibcode:2017Chmsp.173..557P. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.091. PMID 28142114.
  95. ^ Shalat SL. An evaluation of potential exposures to lead and other metals as the result of aerosolized particulate matter from artificial turf playing fields. 2011. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. http://www.nj.gov/dep/dsr/publications/artificial-turf-report.pdf
  96. ^ a b "New Penn State Study Debunks Staph Bacteria Scare in Synthetic Turf" (Press release). Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences. August 30, 2006. Archived from the original on August 30, 2006. Retrieved January 11, 2008.
  97. ^ Williams, C. Frank; Pulley, Gilbert E. (2002). Synthetic Surface Heat Studies (PDF) (Report). Brigham Young University. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 10, 2008. Retrieved February 19, 2008.
  98. ^ "Senate (House) studies 'Mod Sod'". Spokane Daily Chronicle. (Washington). Associated Press. November 2, 1971. p. 16.
  99. ^ "Fake turf makers deny fault". Eugene Register-Guard. (Oregon). Associated Press. November 3, 1971. p. 5D.
  100. ^ Underwood, John (November 15, 1971). "New Slant on the Mod Sod". Sports Illustrated. p. 32.
  101. ^ "Ask Dr. Geier – Are ACL tears more common on grass or FieldTurf? | Dr. David Geier – Sports Medicine Simplified". Dr. David Geier. January 18, 2013. Archived from the original on January 9, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2015.
  102. ^ "Turf Toe-OrthoInfo – AAOS". Orthoinfo.aaos.org. August 1, 2012. Archived from the original on December 9, 2015. Retrieved December 24, 2015.

 This article incorporates text by National Center for Health Research available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license. The text and its release have been received by the Wikimedia Volunteer Response Team

; for more information, see the talk page.

 

Driving Directions in


Driving Directions From TURFIT LAS VEGAS to
Driving Directions From Las Vegas Artificial Lawns to
Driving Directions From TurFresh to
Driving Directions From SYNLawn Las Vegas to
Driving Directions From Synthetic Grass Warehouse to
Driving Directions From Realturf Las Vegas to
Driving Directions From [AGW] Artificial Grass Wholesale LLC to
Driving Directions From Everything Turf Pros - Artificial Turf - Artificial Grass - Las Vegas to
Driving Directions From Leisure Lawn Artificial Grass to
Driving Directions From Las Vegas Artificial Grass to
Driving Directions From Pure Turf USA to
Driving Directions From Fountains of Bellagio to
Driving Directions From Suncoast Hotel and Casino to
Driving Directions From Paris Las Vegas to
Driving Directions From Encore Las Vegas to

Reviews for


Josh Bodell

(5)

Eric and team did an amazing job. They worked with me for months while I got HOA approval for the project. Once they began working they were great, going over everything in detail and making sure things were perfect. This project included wall repair, stucco and paint repair, paver and turf installation. Extremely satisfied with this experience.

Shana Shapiro

(5)

Chris, the design consultant, Dave the production manager, along with their install team Opulent were affordable, upfront with costs, efficient and professional. Attached are some before and after pictures. Highly recommend their services.

Dawna OgleYohe

(5)

My initial contact was with Ray, whom did an excellent job giving me an estimate on what I wanted done in my small yard and walkway., the guys that came out and did the work were superior. They did an excellent job. I’m very pleased with this company. I will highly recommend them to family and friends, and I will be using them in the near future for other little projects.

Zachary Maley

(5)

Albert and his team at RockNBlock are the definition of true professionals. At the end of our project, there were a couple of outstanding issues. When Albert heard I was dissatisfied with the original work, he immediately called me to discuss the next steps. After coming over and walking the property, he came up with multiple solutions to the issues, and his team started the following Tuesday. Within a couple of days, our backyard has never looked better. They did an unbelievable job and went above and beyond anything we expected. I can not recommend this crew enough. It is rare to find vendors who will go out of their way to ensure their customers are 100% happy. For any landscaping projects around the valley - going with RockNBlock is a safe bet.

Rob Foster

(5)

We have been working with Al and the team for many years (8) to be exact. We have had the pleasure of working with many of their clients throughout this time and we absolutely love how their clients are so pleased with the work they do and the outcome of the projects! The sales team and staff have been very supportive and professional and that’s hard to come by. We look forward to many more years of this partnership with a very positive and motivated company that’s always looking out for the best interests of the community!

https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChZDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUNabHREQktBEAE!2m1!1s0x0:0x19c06675a06c11f!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgICZltDBKA%7CCgsIsbbzpwYQ2O6PVg%7C?hl=en-US

https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChZDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUNuLWJTWWZnEAE!2m1!1s0x0:0x19c06675a06c11f!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgICn-bSYfg%7CCgsI9OTbtwYQ2O-gbA%7C?hl=en-US

https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnTUNJb0pMdXJRRRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x19c06675a06c11f!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgMCIoJLurQE%7CCgsIk9yfvwYQ6NyVNQ%7C?hl=en-US

https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChZDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURYckktT2VREAE!2m1!1s0x0:0x19c06675a06c11f!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgIDXrI-OeQ%7CCgwI8v-5uQYQwNC54gI%7C?hl=en-US

https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnTURvbmRMQ29nRRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x19c06675a06c11f!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgMDondLCogE%7CCgwIrpi6wAYQ-M-VygE%7C?hl=en-US

https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChZDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUQ3b3NYMENBEAE!2m1!1s0x0:0x19c06675a06c11f!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgID7osX0CA%7CCgwI2ImetgYQyNOA-QI%7C?hl=en-US

View GBP